Proposition 28: USC experts discuss the promise and pitfalls of arts education expansion in California

In 2022, voters overwhelmingly approved California Proposition 28, a state ballot initiative to expand arts education in K-12 public schools, including charter schools. The measure provides schools with an additional 1% of their annual budget for visual arts, drama, dance, music or media arts.

While initially praised for its potential, concerns have surfaced about how the funds are used and distributed, prompting calls for greater oversight and transparency.

USC experts are always available Discuss the wide-ranging benefits of music and arts education to youth well-being, as well as the challenges facing the rollout of Proposition 28.

touch: Nina Raffio, or (213) 442-8464; USC Media Relations, or (213) 740-2215

USC study shows music education boosts youth well-being

Beatrice Ilari

Beatriz Ilari, associate professor of music education at the USC Thornton School of Music, said, “Music can be a great way to help students develop skills and abilities, exercise their emotions, engage in identity work, and strengthen relationships with school and others. Community connection activities.

“We know that the pandemic has taken a toll on students’ mental health. The many narratives of learning loss that have emerged since the pandemic began paint a grim picture of what some are calling a ‘lost generation,'” Illari said. He is the lead author of a study linking music education to broad benefits for youth well-being.


Ballot Measures: An Imperfect But Important Democratic Tool

John Matsusaka

“Ballot measures are an important part of California democracy, allowing voters to choose the policies they want, even if legislators disagree. Often voters are able to make good decisions, but they need to hear arguments from both sides to make that decision. When campaigning When spending is completely one-sided, wealthy special interests can dominate the debate and win by default,” said John Matsusaka, executive director of the USC Initiative and Referendum Institute.

“The Proposition 28 campaign is alarming: Supporters (three wealthy businessmen, a teachers union, and a musical instrument company) spent $11 million while opponents spent not a penny. To ensure voters were at the polls If informed at the time, California should provide at least a minimum level of funding to both parties to support their claims,” ​​said Matsuzaka, a jointly appointed professor of business, law and political science at the USC Marshall School. School of Business and USC Gould School of Law.


Pollster warns public support key to avoid repeal

Christian R. Gross

“Any controversy that arises after a policy is passed is likely to reduce future voter support,” said Christian Grose, professor of political science and public policy and academic director of the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences. support for this initiative.

“Sponsors who want to avoid repealing Proposition 28 may need to address the controversy and explain accountability measures so as not to reduce public support,” said Gross, who polled Proposition 28 before California voters cast their ballots. 2022 election and passed.




Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *